
Understanding the Paradox of Inclusion on the Workplace
Recent findings from Highberg's latest Diversity & Inclusion Benchmark reveal a curious contradiction: while employees report feeling more inclusive in their actions, their overall sense of inclusion within the workplace has diminished. This highlights a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue surrounding diversity and inclusion (D&I) in professional environments. As geopolitical tensions and societal issues ripple through our lives, the workplace feels these pressures too, impacting employees’ perceptions and behaviors.
Rising Inclusive Behavior Amidst Declining Inclusion
The recent survey indicated that 70% of respondents consider themselves inclusive, up from 63%. This is accompanied by a commendable trend of individuals engaging in inclusive behaviors, such as actively listening and advocating for colleagues from diverse backgrounds. However, this seemingly positive shift does not equate to enhanced feelings of belonging; instead, the percentage of employees who feel fully included has dropped to 63% from 66%. Such discrepancies often arise from a phenomenon known as social desirability bias—people may believe they are acting inclusively while others perceive a different reality.
External Factors Affecting the Workplace
Several external pressures significantly affect work culture, leading to a growing sense of unease among employees. The survey reported that 29% of respondents feel external events disrupt their work lives, and 45% noted that societal polarization contributes to workplace tensions. Additionally, Figurehead's research links ongoing geopolitical developments, such as the Ukraine war and new legislative changes in the European Union, to an altered internal culture within many organizations. With a significant portion of the workforce feeling these strains, it becomes clear that a comprehensive and thoughtful approach to D&I is more critical than ever.
The Polarization Complication
For many, particularly in multinational firms, navigating the conversation around D&I can seem daunting. Younger employees, women, and those from bicultural backgrounds often express heightened awareness and positivity towards D&I measures. Conversely, older employees and men reported increased negativity, creating an unsettling divide. Striking a balance between open discussions about D&I while ensuring a safe space for all remains a complex challenge for management.
Building Bridges Through HR Initiatives
In light of these complexities, HR has a vital role as a bridge-builder within organizations. They need to not only facilitate discussions around inclusion but also provide tools and strategies that help employees navigate these intricate dynamics. Organizations contemplating their public stances on social issues must also consider the potential impact on workplace safety and morale. A proactive approach incorporating psychological safety can result in a healthier workplace culture.
Conclusion: The Path Forward
The interplay between individual behavior and collective feelings of inclusion presents a unique challenge that companies must address thoughtfully. Gido van Puijenbroek emphasizes that D&I should be embedded in an organization’s culture and leadership—not merely treated as reactions to prevailing trends. Organizations are encouraged to foster environments where employees feel safe to express their views while enhancing the understanding and awareness of D&I initiatives across the board.
Write A Comment